![]() ![]() I then laid out what I saw, from my more than three decades in the military and from studying national security as a historian, as the four categories of challenges to national and international security. We would also work hard to describe what was at stake and to explain why accomplishing those ends was worth the risks and potential cost in treasure and, especially, blood. The strategies needed to be logical with regard to the means employed and the desired ends. ![]() I insisted that these strategies must identify not only goals, but also our assumptions-especially assumptions concerning the degree of agency and control that we and our partners could expect in order to make progress toward those goals. The options we developed, if approved, would become integrated strategies. The work, however, should begin with identifying challenges and understanding them on their own terms and from the perspective of “the other.” I asked our team not only to map the interests of rivals, adversaries, and enemies, but also to consider the emotions, aspirations, and ideologies that drive and constrain them. “partners to make progress toward clearly defined goals. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |